Gothamist77%

Wall Street bonuses hit record high as NY lawmakers debate raising taxes on the rich 0%

By Jimmy Vielkind0%

3/26/2026, 11:51:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and False Dilemma, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 1,021 faulty-reasoning hits from 625 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

Soaring profits on Wall Street have led to record bonuses, stuffing public coffers with additional tax revenue as New York state and city develop their latest budgets. 
But state Comptroller Tom DiNapoli said the $49.2 billion cash-bonus pool his office tallied shouldn’t be a license to expand government spending, and could just be a one-off. 
“As budgets are being finalized both at the city and state level, caution would be appropriate,” the Democratic comptroller said. 
“There are so many geopolitical trends that are happening that are way beyond our control. 
As always, we talk about the need for the state and obviously for the city to build up their reserves and keep those reserves for what is truly a rainy day.” 
The report by DiNapoli’s office put clear numbers on what politicians have been saying for months: Wall Street boomed in 2025, thanks to growth in artificial intelligence companies and market reactions to the Republican-backed tax and spending bill. 
The average bonus ticked up 6% from the previous year, to $246,900, according to the report. 
That reflects the 30% increase in profits, which increased to $65.1 billion in 2025. 
Cash-bonus payments increased by nearly 30% between 2023 and 2024. 
There are about 200,000 securities industry employees in New York City, the report said. 
That’s roughly flat from 2024 and is a near-20-year high. 
New York state is highly reliant on top earners to fund government programs. 
The top 2% of taxpayers accounted for just over half the $61 billion of income taxes collected last fiscal year, according to the state tax department. 
Most of those people work on Wall Street. 
DiNapoli said the securities industry accounted for $22 billion in state income tax revenue and $6.7 billion of city tax revenue last fiscal year. 
Additionally, Wall Street accounted for 20.2% of all economic activity in New York City in 2024. 
“These jobs are important,” DiNapoli said. 
Gov. 
Kathy Hochul agrees. 
The Democrat said she was able to increase spending on child care and Medicaid because of last year’s boom  and that there’s no need to raise taxes. 
Hochul has said she is resisting calls to increase income and corporate taxes because she doesn’t want to push wealthy taxpayers out of state. 
Progressive groups disagree, arguing millionaires don’t move based on taxation. 
They said the comptroller’s report is the latest sign that wealthy people are getting wealthier and can afford to contribute more to social programs. 
“Given [President Donald] Trump’s massive tax cuts for the rich just last year, it’s no surprise Wall Street bonuses are surging while regular New Yorkers are choosing between rent and groceries,” said Divya Sundaram, deputy director of the advocacy group Our Time, which grew out of Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s campaign. 
“It’s time Governor Hochul stood up to the MAGA billionaire agenda and taxed the rich for a New York we can afford.” 
While the number of securities industry jobs in New York held steady, DiNapoli’s report noted the share of U.S. finance jobs located in the Empire State declined again, to 17.4% in 2025. 
In 1990, 33% of the country’s securities industry was located in New York, according to the report. 
DiNapoli declined to weigh in on the debate over raising taxes. 
“We're not seeing a dramatic drop in head count, right? 
So I think the issue is more how do we ensure there's more growth in the city,” he said. 
“I think we need to take the perspective that New York City being the global capital for finance is a good thing  that we want Wall Street, and those who are employed in it, to be here and to feel welcome here.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 13.8%Jimmy Vielkind: 2.7%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias13.8%This article: 2.2%Jimmy Vielkind: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias2.2%This article: 1.6%Jimmy Vielkind: 1.7%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic1.6%This article: 3.4%Jimmy Vielkind: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic3.4%This article: 0.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 0.8%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 1.9%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 9.9%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect4.0%This article: 7.7%Jimmy Vielkind: 1.4%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion7.7%This article: 5.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 1.6%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias5.0%This article: 0.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 1.8%Jimmy Vielkind: 3.1%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias1.8%This article: 6.9%Jimmy Vielkind: 1.9%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias6.9%This article: 3.8%Jimmy Vielkind: 6.7%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias3.8%This article: 0.5%Jimmy Vielkind: 4.6%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias0.5%This article: 0.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 1.5%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 8.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 4.6%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias8.0%This article: 0.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 1.5%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 3.5%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect4.0%This article: 0.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.7%Jimmy Vielkind: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias6.7%This article: 0.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 3.5%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.6%Jimmy Vielkind: 3.6%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority4.6%This article: 8.5%Jimmy Vielkind: 1.7%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma8.5%This article: 0.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.7%Jimmy Vielkind: 4.3%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization6.7%This article: 1.6%Jimmy Vielkind: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring1.6%This article: 8.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 0.9%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon8.0%This article: 15.8%Jimmy Vielkind: 7.3%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion15.8%This article: 1.6%Jimmy Vielkind: 1.6%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question1.6%This article: 17.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 3.0%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)17.0%This article: 0.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.1%Jimmy Vielkind: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division2.1%This article: 0.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 1.2%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.0%This article: 0.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.8%Jimmy Vielkind: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground1.8%This article: 0.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 0.9%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.1%Jimmy Vielkind: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote6.1%This article: 0.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 4.3%Jimmy Vielkind: 3.1%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice4.3%This article: 8.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 1.3%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination8.0%This article: 0.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 2.4%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 0.9%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jimmy Vielkind: 0.4%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

625 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers46%attributed speech338writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageTom DiNapoli • 28 words • 0.0% coverageTom DiNapoli • 20 words • 0.0% coverageTom DiNapoli • 15 words • 0.0% coverageTom DiNapoli • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageTom DiNapoli • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageTom DiNapoli • 6 words • 0.0% coverageKathy Hochul • 1 words • 0.0% coverageKathy Hochul • 3 words • 0.0% coverageKathy Hochul • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageDivya Sundaram • 24 words • 0.0% coverageDivya Sundaram • 50 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageTom DiNapoli • 17 words • 0.0% coverageTom DiNapoli • 11 words • 0.0% coverageTom DiNapoli • 10 words • 0.0% coverageTom DiNapoli • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Divya Sundaram

100%flagged-word coverage
74 attributed words26% of attributed speech61% writer coverage
0%35.0%70.0%Indoctrination+67.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Divya Sundaram: 67.6%67.6%Unattributed Quote-11.2 ptsWriter: 11.2%Divya Sundaram: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-8.0 ptsWriter: 8.0%Divya Sundaram: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.