Topic summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 277 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Visas results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 436 hits . Analysis detected 3,056 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,848 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 65% (5,838 of 16,562 topics). This Visas is worse (more manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group. Visas
Topic details
Total words: 2,848
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.8% percentile 3.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 15.3% 15.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.3% 14.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Burden of Proof: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.4% Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst