Author summary
0%5 analyzed articles/videos970 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elizabeth Beattie results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 591 hits. Analysis detected 5,450 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,176 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 48% (3,456 of 6,628 authors). This Elizabeth Beattie is better (less manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group.
Elizabeth Beattie
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
48%Elizabeth Beattie (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,176
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

48% percentile
025507510047.9% percentile
2.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.7%7.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.4%6.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.4%5.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.0%5.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.4%1.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.4%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate