Author summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 1,038 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Himari Semans results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 564 hits . Analysis detected 5,408 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,216 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (2,021 of 6,588 authors). This Himari Semans is worse (more manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group. Himari Semans
Author details
Total words: 4,216
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.3% percentile 3.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.4% 13.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.2% 13.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.3% 10.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 7.4% 7.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.2% 4.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 3.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst