Topic summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 5,409 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Virginia Politics results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 2,643 hits . Analysis detected 12,608 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,235 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (14,389 of 16,562 topics). This Virginia Politics is better (less manipulative) than 86.90% of the peer group. Virginia Politics
Topic details
Total words: 16,235
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles16.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 16.3% 16.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 10.8% 10.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst