Topic summary
⁠40%4 analyzed articles/videos2,933 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Venezuelan Politics results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Unattributed Quote, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 1,845 hits. Analysis detected 13,873 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,210 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (11,716 of 16,562 topics). This Venezuelan Politics is better (less manipulative) than 70.70% of the peer group.
Venezuelan Politics

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

29% percentile
025507510029.3% percentile
2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles15.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.1%12.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.0%12.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos