Topic summary
⁠47%2 analyzed articles/videos285 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Usha Vance results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 346 hits. Analysis detected 2,107 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,321 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (11,709 of 15,447 topics). This Usha Vance is better (less manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group.
Usha Vance
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,321
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510024.2% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.4%10.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.4%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos