Topic summary
59% 11 analyzed articles/videos 9,128 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Use Of Force results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 5,004 hits . Analysis detected 36,020 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,870 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (11,734 of 15,330 topics). This Use Of Force is better (less manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group. Use Of Force
Topic details
Total words: 34,870
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.5% percentile 2.0% BS Score11 analyzed articles34.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 14.3% 14.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.2% 12.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
WAMU 15% 7/16/2026, 1:17:14 PM