Topic summary
⁠72%3 analyzed articles/videos1,906 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Senate Races results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 2,288 hits. Analysis detected 12,523 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,797 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,705 of 16,559 topics). This Us Senate Races is better (less manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group.
Us Senate Races
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 11,797
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510035.4% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.4%19.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.9%9.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos