Topic summary
⁠53%3 analyzed articles/videos1,481 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Russia Relations results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 1,166 hits. Analysis detected 6,681 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,079 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,763 of 16,562 topics). This US Russia Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group.
US Russia Relations
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510059.2% percentile
3.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 23.0%23.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.2%14.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.7%4.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 23.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos