Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos4,888 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us-Israel War results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 2,716 hits. Analysis detected 12,903 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,573 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (11,137 of 16,562 topics). This Us-Israel War is better (less manipulative) than 67.20% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510032.8% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles14.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.6%18.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos