Topic summary
⁠80%3 analyzed articles/videos3,100 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Central Command results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 1,964 hits. Analysis detected 14,072 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,877 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (11,798 of 16,562 topics). This Us Central Command is better (less manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group.
Us Central Command

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

29% percentile
025507510028.8% percentile
2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles15.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.0%10.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.4%12.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.7%7.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos