Topic summary
56% 1 analyzed article/video 678 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Urban Flooding results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Indoctrination , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 414 hits . Analysis detected 2,067 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,034 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 74% (4,447 of 16,562 topics). This Urban Flooding is worse (more manipulative) than 73.20% of the peer group. Urban Flooding
Topic details
Total words: 2,034
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.2% percentile 4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 2.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst