Topic summary
56%1 analyzed article/video678 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Urban Flooding results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Indoctrination, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 414 hits. Analysis detected 2,067 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,034 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 74% (4,447 of 16,562 topics). This Urban Flooding is worse (more manipulative) than 73.20% of the peer group.
Urban Flooding
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,034
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510073.2% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.7%7.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 6.6%6.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 2.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos