Topic summary
⁠85%4 analyzed articles/videos1,852 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ukraine Russia War results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 2,526 hits. Analysis detected 16,273 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,905 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,506 of 16,562 topics). This Ukraine Russia War is better (less manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group.
Ukraine Russia War
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510042.6% percentile
2.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles12.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.6%19.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.2%7.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.8%3.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 16.9%16.9%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos