Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 6,311 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joe Scarborough results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 3,351 hits . Analysis detected 27,116 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,907 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 61% (2,400 of 6,140 authors). This Joe Scarborough is worse (more manipulative) than 60.90% of the peer group. Joe Scarborough
Author details
Total words: 16,907
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.9% percentile 3.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles16.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 19.7% 19.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.2% 10.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 5.4% 5.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 8.4% 8.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 2.1% 2.1% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 19.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 19.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 5.4%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst