Topic summary
56% 10 analyzed articles/videos 11,265 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Turkey results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 4,022 hits . Analysis detected 38,382 faulty-reasoning hits from 46,326 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 12% (13,816 of 15,686 topics). This Turkey is better (less manipulative) than 88.10% of the peer group. Turkey
Topic details
Total words: 46,326
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.9% percentile 1.7% BS Score10 analyzed articles46.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst