Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,787 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trump Assassination Attempt results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 763 hits. Analysis detected 5,740 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,148 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (11,726 of 16,562 topics). This Trump Assassination Attempt is better (less manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group.
Trump Assassination Attempt
Topic details
Total words: 7,148
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

29% percentile
025507510029.2% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.7%10.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos