Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Transgender Healthcare results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 3,111 hits. Analysis detected 19,262 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,830 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Transgender Healthcare is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Transgender Healthcare
Topic details
Total words: 13,830
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 22.5%22.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 20.1%20.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.3%14.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.6%6.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 20.1%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 22.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos