Gothamist77%

NYC parents say Mount Sinai plans to share trans children's records with Trump administration 25%

By Caroline Lewis38% Giulia Heyward48%

6/4/2026, 4:48:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 136 hits. Analysis detected 914 faulty-reasoning hits from 630 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 37.3% and a BS Rank of 25% (16,491 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 75.30% of the article peer group.

Two parents of trans children who received gender-affirming care at Mount Sinai Health System said representatives of the hospital network called them on Thursday and said their children’s health information would be shared with the federal government. 
 I was blindsided by this because we're not even receiving care there anymore,” said Dawn Gabriel, one of the parents. 
She said her 17-year-old son received gender-affirming care at Mount Sinai until the health system informed her earlier this year that it was discontinuing such services for minors. 
The other parent, who asked not to be identified out of concern for their family’s safety, said a Mount Sinai social worker told them during a three-minute phone call that the records would be shared in response to a federal subpoena. 
The parents said Mount Sinai did not reveal when the records would be released or provide any additional details. 
Mount Sinai declined to comment. 
Reports of the Mount Sinai calls come amid concerns from trans New Yorkers and LGBTQ+ advocates that NYU Langone could be required to share similar patient information with the Trump administration in response to a federal grand jury subpoena the health system received last month. 
The subpoena issued to NYU Langone requests documents on patients under 18 who received treatment for gender dysphoria at the health system over the past six years, as well as the personnel records of their medical providers. 
Gabriel said Mount Sinai told her the records would be anonymized, but she is not confident that would adequately protect her son’s privacy. 
 I'm worried,” Gabriel said. 
“My son has a passport with the correct gender marker. 
Is this going to affect him when he has to get it renewed because they have his private medical records?” 
She added that her husband is concerned the Trump administration will come after the parents of trans kids, too. 
The DOJ did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Thursday and has previously declined to say why it is seeking records related to minors who received gender-affirming care. 
However, the Trump administration has repeatedly raised concerns about providing so-called “sex-rejecting” procedures such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy to minors. 
A group of trans New Yorkers, some of whom are being represented through their parents, filed a class-action lawsuit against NYU Langone and the U.S. 
Department of Justice earlier this week seeking to block their health information from being shared with the Trump administration. 
That complaint states that, “upon information and belief, DOJ has sent virtually identical federal grand jury subpoenas to other healthcare institutions in New York City, including Mount Sinai Health System.” 
But it has not yet been confirmed that Mount Sinai received such a subpoena, said Karen Loewy, senior counsel for Lambda Legal, one of the nonprofit law firms that filed the class-action suit. 
She said her firm has only heard rumors to that effect. 
Still, she said the class-action lawsuit was intentionally written in such a way that it would also apply to people who received gender-affirming care at Mount Sinai or other NYC institutions as minors and were at risk of having their medical records shared with the Trump administration. 
The lawsuit asks a federal judge to declare the NYU Langone subpoena and any similar subpoenas unconstitutional and to block the DOJ from requesting such information from NYU Langone or other health care institutions. 
NYU Langone has not yet said whether it will comply with its federal subpoena. 
The hospital system was initially given until June 10 to respond, but a federal judge on Thursday pushed the case's emergency hearing to June 22 and delayed any production of records sought through the subpoena until at least June 24. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 13.3%Caroline Lewis: 2.0%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias13.3%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 1.3%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 21.6%Caroline Lewis: 3.2%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic21.6%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.9%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Caroline Lewis: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias5.2%This article: 5.7%Caroline Lewis: 5.5%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect5.7%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.4%Caroline Lewis: 0.7%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 3.6%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%Caroline Lewis: 1.3%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias6.7%This article: 12.1%Caroline Lewis: 6.6%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias12.1%This article: 0.8%Caroline Lewis: 2.8%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias0.8%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.5%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 1.2%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.9%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.3%Caroline Lewis: 1.4%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias6.3%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 1.7%Caroline Lewis: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias1.7%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.5%Caroline Lewis: 3.5%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority3.5%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 3.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope3.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.1%Caroline Lewis: 2.8%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization7.1%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.7%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon3.0%This article: 7.3%Caroline Lewis: 3.2%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion7.3%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.2%Caroline Lewis: 2.7%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.2%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 7.5%Caroline Lewis: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof7.5%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 1.0%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.8%Caroline Lewis: 1.4%Gothamist: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.8%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 11.3%Caroline Lewis: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote11.3%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 5.9%Caroline Lewis: 3.1%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice5.9%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 2.6%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 10.6%Caroline Lewis: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias10.6%This article: 0.0%Caroline Lewis: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

630 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers35%attributed speech408writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageDawn Gabriel • 21 words • 0.0% coverageDawn Gabriel • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageMount Sinai • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageDawn Gabriel • 23 words • 0.0% coverageDawn Gabriel • 5 words • 0.0% coverageDawn Gabriel • 10 words • 0.0% coverageDawn Gabriel • 20 words • 0.0% coverageDawn Gabriel • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageKaren Loewy • 33 words • 0.0% coverageKaren Loewy • 11 words • 0.0% coverageKaren Loewy • 47 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Dawn Gabriel

92%flagged-word coverage
126 attributed words57% of attributed speech73% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Unattributed Quote-17.4 ptsWriter: 17.4%Dawn Gabriel: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -16.4 ptsWriter: 16.4%Dawn Gabriel: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-9.1 ptsWriter: 9.1%Dawn Gabriel: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.