Topic summary
38% 6 analyzed articles/videos 4,080 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thomas Massie results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 2,998 hits . Analysis detected 25,392 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,498 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 10% (15,046 of 16,562 topics). This Thomas Massie is better (less manipulative) than 90.80% of the peer group. Thomas Massie
Topic details
Total words: 33,498
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.2% percentile 1.5% BS Score6 analyzed articles33.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Ad Hominem: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst