Topic summary
15% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,102 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Theft results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 951 hits . Analysis detected 7,195 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,365 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (14,583 of 15,755 topics). This Theft is better (less manipulative) than 92.60% of the peer group. Theft
Topic details
Total words: 12,365
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.4% percentile 1.5% BS Score6 analyzed articles12.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst