Topic summary
⁠41%3 analyzed articles/videos1,523 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Theatre results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 698 hits. Analysis detected 6,567 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,443 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (8,103 of 16,562 topics). This Theatre is worse (more manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group.
Theatre
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,443
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510051.1% percentile
3.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.4%10.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 12.8%12.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.1%4.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.0%3.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos