Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 796 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Helen Surgenor results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 239 hits . Analysis detected 2,881 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,184 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 44% (3,726 of 6,628 authors). This Helen Surgenor is better (less manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group. Helen Surgenor
Author details
Total words: 3,184
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.8% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.5% 4.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 7.5%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst