Topic summary
65% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,422 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The View results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 2,502 hits . Analysis detected 17,939 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,487 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (10,239 of 16,241 topics). This The View is better (less manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group. The View
Topic details
Total words: 14,487
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.0% percentile 2.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles14.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 17.3% 17.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.6% 12.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 7.5% 7.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Tu Quoque: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst