Rosie O'Donnell, 64, shares shock facelift pics after paying more than the price of a car only for no one to notice 31%

By Sameer Suri0%

5/27/2026, 3:01:15 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.3% saturation with 200 hits. Analysis detected 1,580 faulty-reasoning hits from 760 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 40.6% and a BS Rank of 31% (15,128 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 69.10% of the article peer group.

Rosie O'Donnell, 64, shares shock facelift pics after paying more than the price of a car only for no one to notice 
Have YOU got a story? 
Email tips@dailymail.com 
See more Daily Mail on Google - save us as a Preferred Source 
By SAMEER SURI 
Published: 18:01 EDT, 27 May 2026 | Updated: 19:56 EDT, 27 May 2026 
Rosie O'Donnell shared a flabbergasting set of before-and-after photos showing the effects of a facelift she underwent in January. 
The 64-year-old actress agonized over the decision to have the 'shameful' procedure, which she regarded as a 'betrayal of feminism.' 
She bit the bullet and forked over more than 'I have ever paid for a car,' only to emerge from surgery and realize nobody noticed the difference anyway. 
O'Donnell rationalized the result as 'the best possible outcome' when she went public with the operation Monday in bizarre, freewheeling blank verse on her Substack. 
'I didn’t disappear, I didn’t become someone else - I just stopped arguing with the mirror,' she wrote. 
'And maybe that’s enough. 
Or at the very least…it’s what a lower deep plane face lift looks like when it minds its own business.' 
As her disclosure went viral, she posted 'THE B4 & AFTER' to Instagram Wednesday, allowing fans to make their own determination as to how much had changed. 
She had explained on Monday that she once harbored a strident moral objection to facelifts and 'assigned myself as head of all women who would never' get one, as they were a 'betrayal' both of 'feminism' and of 'aging.' 
However O'Donnell found her position on the issue softening when she shed 50lb and discovered that her skin had begun to sag as a result. 
'It wasn’t wrinkles - it was gravity,' wrote the former The View anchor. 
'I’d look in the mirror and think - this isn’t aging, this is melting with intention.' 
O'Donnell confessed: 'I tried to be evolved about it. and say things like: “This is natural. 
This is earned.” 
And then… “umm how earned does it have to look?” 
There’s a point where acceptance starts to feel like lying.' 
The A League Of Their Own actress, who left America and decamped to Ireland to avoid living under the second Trump presidency, started looking into the procedure. 
However she then had to deal with strenuous opposition from her 13-year-old daughter Clay, who 'was not subtle' about her feelings. 
Clay's arguments against the facelift were: 'You earned your wrinkles,' 'Young women look up to you,' and: 'I wouldn’t be able to respect you if you did it.' 
She reminded O'Donnell of her own 'younger, more certain, more morally rigid self' and successfully delayed her in getting the procedure for months. 
However O'Donnell ultimately persuaded herself she did not want to teach her children that 'my body belongs to an idea either. 
Even a good idea. 
Even feminism.' 
Overcoming her misgivings and steeling herself, she paid a price higher than that of any car she ever purchased and went in for the operation. 
She remembered that 'right before I went under, I grabbed my doctors hand and said: "I will never say: 'God, I wish you did more.'" 
And I meant it.' 
The surgeon appeared to have taken her guidance seriously enough that 'no one has noticed' she procured the lift. 
'Not one person. 
Not a friend, not a stranger, not even people who owe me compliments My teenager has not said a word. 
Nothing.' 
O'Donnell has four adult children - Parker, 31, Chelsea, 28, Blake, 26, and Vivienne, 23 - who presumably also failed to detect the tweaks to their mother's face. 
'I went through a full existential feminist crisis, had my face and neck surgically altered, and the result is… zippo,' she marveled. 
The facelift comes a half-decade after she insisted she would never acquire one on the grounds that it would prevent her from getting the parts she wanted. 
'I always knew as an actress that when I got into my 60s, I would be playing the Geraldine Page roles,' she shared with Vulture. 
'I wasn't going to have plastic surgery. 
I was going to look the way a woman my age should look, and I always thought that would be a blessing in my older age. 
I would get to play the Colleen Dewhurst roles. 
That has turned out to be true. 
I'm getting all this acting work now that I'm closing in on 60.' 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.8%Sameer Suri: 1.8%Daily Mail: 2.7%Confirmation Bias5.8%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%Sameer Suri: 1.9%Daily Mail: 2.8%Availability Heuristic1.8%This article: 3.3%Sameer Suri: 0.5%Daily Mail: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic3.3%This article: 7.5%Sameer Suri: 0.8%Daily Mail: 0.8%Hindsight Bias7.5%This article: 0.5%Sameer Suri: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.5%This article: 5.8%Sameer Suri: 4.0%Daily Mail: 6.9%Framing Effect5.8%This article: 7.0%Sameer Suri: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.4%Loss Aversion7.0%This article: 0.9%Sameer Suri: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.9%This article: 7.0%Sameer Suri: 0.6%Daily Mail: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect7.0%This article: 6.7%Sameer Suri: 2.1%Daily Mail: 2.1%Optimism Bias6.7%This article: 3.3%Sameer Suri: 0.3%Daily Mail: 1.1%Pessimism Bias3.3%This article: 22.8%Sameer Suri: 10.4%Daily Mail: 10.9%Negativity Bias22.8%This article: 7.2%Sameer Suri: 3.5%Daily Mail: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias7.2%This article: 3.7%Sameer Suri: 0.5%Daily Mail: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error3.7%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.4%Daily Mail: 1.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 4.5%Daily Mail: 5.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.7%Sameer Suri: 1.4%Daily Mail: 1.7%Recency Bias1.7%This article: 5.1%Sameer Suri: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.4%Primacy Effect5.1%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 1.2%Daily Mail: 1.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.9%Daily Mail: 3.0%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 4.5%Sameer Suri: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.9%False Dilemma4.5%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.9%Sameer Suri: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.9%This article: 11.8%Sameer Suri: 2.9%Daily Mail: 3.9%Hasty Generalization11.8%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.6%Sameer Suri: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.8%Bandwagon3.6%This article: 8.4%Sameer Suri: 3.5%Daily Mail: 6.5%Appeal to Emotion8.4%This article: 1.3%Sameer Suri: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.5%Begging the Question1.3%This article: 17.6%Sameer Suri: 3.3%Daily Mail: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)17.6%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 3.4%Sameer Suri: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Appeal to Nature3.4%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 18.2%Sameer Suri: 3.3%Daily Mail: 3.1%Anecdotal18.2%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.7%Sameer Suri: 0.9%Daily Mail: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.7%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.6%Sameer Suri: 3.3%Daily Mail: 3.3%Unattributed Quote8.6%This article: 3.3%Sameer Suri: 1.5%Daily Mail: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection3.3%This article: 26.3%Sameer Suri: 7.7%Daily Mail: 8.9%Biased Writer Voice26.3%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.2%Daily Mail: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 3.6%Sameer Suri: 0.6%Daily Mail: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias3.6%This article: 0.0%Sameer Suri: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Sameer Suri: 0.6%Daily Mail: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.6%

760 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers51%attributed speech371writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageSameer Suri • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageRosie O'Donnell • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageRosie O'Donnell • 18 words • 0.0% coverageRosie O'Donnell • 4 words • 100.0% coverageRosie O'Donnell • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageRosie O'Donnell • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageRosie O'Donnell • 13 words • 0.0% coverageRosie O'Donnell • 16 words • 0.0% coverageRosie O'Donnell • 16 words • 100.0% coverageRosie O'Donnell • 3 words • 0.0% coverageRosie O'Donnell • 10 words • 0.0% coverageRosie O'Donnell • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageClay • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageRosie O'Donnell • 21 words • 0.0% coverageRosie O'Donnell • 4 words • 0.0% coverageRosie O'Donnell • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageRosie O'Donnell • 25 words • 0.0% coverageRosie O'Donnell • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageRosie O'Donnell • 3 words • 100.0% coverageRosie O'Donnell • 20 words • 0.0% coverageRosie O'Donnell • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageRosie O'Donnell • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageRosie O'Donnell • 25 words • 0.0% coverageRosie O'Donnell • 7 words • 0.0% coverageRosie O'Donnell • 26 words • 0.0% coverageRosie O'Donnell • 9 words • 0.0% coverageRosie O'Donnell • 7 words • 0.0% coverageRosie O'Donnell • 13 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Clay

100%flagged-word coverage
28 attributed words7.2% of attributed speech96% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Clay: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-43.7 ptsWriter: 43.7%Clay: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-7.3 ptsWriter: 7.3%Clay: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-6.7 ptsWriter: 6.7%Clay: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -5.4 ptsWriter: 5.4%Clay: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.