Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,947 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hanna Panreck results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 1,677 hits . Analysis detected 11,812 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,519 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 65% (2,346 of 6,628 authors). This Hanna Panreck is worse (more manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group. Hanna Panreck
Author details
Total words: 7,519
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.6% percentile 3.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.6% 10.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 12.8% 12.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.7% 13.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 22.3% 22.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 22.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.5%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.7%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Author 12.8%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Horn Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst