Fox News89%

Newsom explodes on Joe Rogan in response to clip of podcaster calling governor 'f---ing con man' 91%

By Hanna Panreck0%

5/1/2026, 8:36:13 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Ad Hominem, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 68.4% saturation with 309 hits. Analysis detected 1,105 faulty-reasoning hits from 452 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 83.8% and a BS Rank of 91% (2,178 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 90.10% of the article peer group.

Gov. 
Gavin Newsom, D-Calif., exploded on podcast host Joe Rogan in a post from his press office account, in response to a resurfaced clip in which the podcast host called Newsom an "f---ing con man." 
"JOE 'LITTLE GUY' ROGAN IS TOO CHICKEN TO HAVE ME ON HIS FAILING PODCAST BECAUSE HE KNOW I'D CRUSH HIM, SO HE TAKES CHEAP SHOTS FROM THE PEANUT GALLERY AS HE GETS RELEGATED TO IRRELEVANCY. 
ALL TALK, NO ACTION. 
I'M READY WHEN YOU ARE, 'LITTLE GUY.' 
OR KEEP HIDING!!!!  Governor GCN," the Trump-style post read. 
The governor's press team was responding to a clip of Rogan discussing the 2024 election with Patrick Bet-David in 2023. 
DAVID SPADE WONDERS IF HOLLYWOOD CAN RECOVER ITS MOVIE INDUSTRY AS PEOPLE FLEE LOS ANGELES 
"Nobody wants President Newsom either," Rogan said. 
"Nobody believes in that guy. 
That guy’s a f---ing con man. 
I mean, everything he did in California, from trying to mandate vaccines for kids when it was totally unnecessary to being caught out in public without a mask and lying about the fact that he was outdoors. 
All of it. 
It’s just, nobody believes in the guy. 
He’s just a politician, just a stone-cold, narrative-driven politician, you know, and nobody thinks he’s a real human," Rogan said during the 2023 discussion. 
Rogan called out Newsom more recently during "The Joe Rogan Experience," after his press office account had mocked Nick Shirley’s daycare fraud investigation by posting what appeared to be a satirical, AI-generated photo of a man carrying several cameras at a daycare and asking a teacher, "Hey, can I see your kids?" 
"Did you see what the governor posted, what Newsom’s press office posted?" 
Rogan asked his guest on a March episode of his show. 
"They posted a photo of Nick Shirley, like a fake Nick Shirley, like a meme  like Nick Shirley peeking into windows." 
JOE ROGAN, MEL GIBSON BLAST GOV. 
NEWSOM AMID WILDFIRES: 'PERSONALLY RUINED' CALIFORNIA 
Newsom posted from his own X account in October, accusing Rogan of being too chicken to have him on. 
In the October 2025 clip Newsom responded to, Rogan said, "You can’t ruin a city and then go on to ruin a state and say, ‘Guys, that was just practice. 
Once I get in as president, I’m gonna fix it all,'" referring to Newsom. 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
Rogan continued, "Like, everybody’s LEAVING. 
You have the highest unemployment. 
You have the highest homelessness. 
Money’s missing. 
You killed Hollywood. 
Like, Hollywood doesn’t exist anymore. 
It’s literally gone. 
You mandated vaccines for kids that didn’t need them. 
He did horrible s---." 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.2%Hanna Panreck: 7.9%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias10.2%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Hanna Panreck: 4.3%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic3.3%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 1.3%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 0.8%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 5.1%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 15.0%Hanna Panreck: 10.6%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect15.0%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 0.8%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 1.8%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 1.5%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 1.4%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 68.4%Hanna Panreck: 22.3%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias68.4%This article: 7.7%Hanna Panreck: 4.3%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias7.7%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 4.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 4.0%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Hanna Panreck: 6.0%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias5.3%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 1.4%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 2.3%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 11.5%Hanna Panreck: 2.7%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias11.5%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 32.3%Hanna Panreck: 12.8%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem32.3%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 1.8%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 1.9%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 7.5%Hanna Panreck: 4.0%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma7.5%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 0.4%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 33.2%Hanna Panreck: 13.7%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization33.2%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 1.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.9%Hanna Panreck: 13.5%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion0.9%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 1.1%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 8.6%Hanna Panreck: 1.6%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.6%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 8.2%Hanna Panreck: 4.3%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal8.2%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 1.4%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 4.9%Hanna Panreck: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy4.9%This article: 6.6%Hanna Panreck: 0.7%Fox Nation: 1.8%Unattributed Quote6.6%This article: 10.2%Hanna Panreck: 3.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection10.2%This article: 8.8%Hanna Panreck: 3.4%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice8.8%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 0.6%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 1.2%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hanna Panreck: 1.8%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%Hanna Panreck: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.8%

452 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers58%attributed speech188writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageGavin Newsom • 35 words • 0.0% coverageGavin Newsom • 4 words • 0.0% coverageGavin Newsom • 7 words • 0.0% coverageGavin Newsom • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Rogan • 7 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Rogan • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Rogan • 6 words • 100.0% coverageJoe Rogan • 37 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Rogan • 3 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Rogan • 7 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Rogan • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 52 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Rogan • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Rogan • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Rogan • 30 words • 100.0% coverageJoe Rogan • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageJoe Rogan • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Rogan • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Rogan • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Rogan • 2 words • 100.0% coverageJoe Rogan • 3 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Rogan • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Rogan • 3 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Rogan • 9 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Rogan • 4 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Gavin Newsom

88%flagged-word coverage
56 attributed words21% of attributed speech83% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Biased Writer Voice-21.3 ptsWriter: 21.3%Gavin Newsom: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-8.5 ptsWriter: 8.5%Gavin Newsom: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -4.3 ptsWriter: 4.3%Gavin Newsom: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.