Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Tensions results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 1,570 hits. Analysis detected 18,194 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,068 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Tensions is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Tensions
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles24.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.1%0.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos