Topic summary
66% 5 analyzed articles/videos 4,585 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tennessee results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 3,242 hits . Analysis detected 17,856 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,379 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (12,149 of 16,446 topics). This Tennessee is better (less manipulative) than 73.90% of the peer group. Tennessee
Topic details
Total words: 17,379
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.1% percentile 2.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles17.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst