Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,054 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Cohen results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 1,474 hits. Analysis detected 7,297 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,316 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 68% (2,081 of 6,365 authors). This James Cohen is worse (more manipulative) than 67.30% of the peer group.
James Cohen
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
68%James Cohen (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,316
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

67% percentile
025507510067.3% percentile
3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 17.8%17.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 19.1%19.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.0%5.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 19.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 20.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate