Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,054 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Cohen results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 1,474 hits . Analysis detected 7,297 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,316 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 68% (2,081 of 6,365 authors). This James Cohen is worse (more manipulative) than 67.30% of the peer group. James Cohen
Author details
Total words: 7,316
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.3% percentile 3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.8% 17.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 19.1% 19.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 19.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 20.1%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst