Topic summary
0% 14 analyzed articles/videos 8,042 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Taiwan results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 4,045 hits . Analysis detected 26,673 faulty-reasoning hits from 32,372 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 19% (12,615 of 15,447 topics). This Taiwan is better (less manipulative) than 81.70% of the peer group. Taiwan
Topic details
Total words: 32,372
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score14 analyzed articles32.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.5% 12.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.1% 12.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst