Topic summary
0% 15 analyzed articles/videos 7,003 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sub-County (region) results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 3,395 hits . Analysis detected 21,375 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,072 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (12,370 of 16,245 topics). This Sub-County (region) is better (less manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group. Sub-County (region)
Topic details
Total words: 24,072
Article count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.9% percentile 2.0% BS Score15 analyzed articles24.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Horn Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.0% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst