Topic summary
⁠22%3 analyzed articles/videos3,606 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Student Loan Policy results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 746 hits. Analysis detected 8,283 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,821 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (14,752 of 16,559 topics). This Student Loan Policy is better (less manipulative) than 89.10% of the peer group.
Student Loan Policy
Topic details
Total words: 12,821
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

11% percentile
025507510010.9% percentile
1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos