Author summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos296 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Morgan Chalfant results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 28.7% saturation with 340 hits. Analysis detected 1,691 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,184 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (777 of 6,363 authors). This Morgan Chalfant is worse (more manipulative) than 87.80% of the peer group.
Morgan Chalfant
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠88%Morgan Chalfant (selected)7%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,184
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

88% percentile
025507510087.8% percentile
6.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 12.7%12.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 10.1%10.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 9.0%9.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 7.1%7.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 9.5%9.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 15.5%15.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 28.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 15.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.1%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 12.7%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.5%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.0%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Middle Ground: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.1%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos