Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,979 analyzed words
BS Summary: These State Of Emergency results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 36.6% saturation with 2,494 hits. Analysis detected 8,787 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,808 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,462 of 16,562 topics). This State Of Emergency is worse (more manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group.
State Of Emergency
Topic details
Total words: 6,808
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510073.1% percentile
4.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 36.6%36.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.6%19.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.2%11.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 8.7%8.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 36.6%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 9.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 4.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos