Topic summary
⁠91%2 analyzed articles/videos1,480 analyzed words
BS Summary: These State Finance results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 484 hits. Analysis detected 5,209 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,440 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (8,396 of 16,562 topics). This State Finance is better (less manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group.
State Finance
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,440
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510049.3% percentile
2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.5%10.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.9%10.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.7%5.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.8%7.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos