Author summary
26% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,627 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brattleboro Reformer results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Halo Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 475 hits . Analysis detected 3,761 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,811 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,504 of 6,364 authors). This Brattleboro Reformer is better (less manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group. Brattleboro Reformer
Author details
Total words: 5,811
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst