Topic summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 5,415 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stadium Development results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 2,148 hits . Analysis detected 17,487 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,381 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (12,244 of 15,142 topics). This Stadium Development is better (less manipulative) than 80.90% of the peer group. Stadium Development
Topic details
Total words: 20,381
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.1% percentile 1.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles20.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.5% 10.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst