Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 4,683 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zane Irwin results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 2,331 hits . Analysis detected 16,076 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,624 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,396 of 6,244 authors). This Zane Irwin is better (less manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group. Zane Irwin
Author details
Total words: 15,624
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.6% percentile 2.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles15.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.9% 14.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.0% 11.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst