Topic summary
⁠82%3 analyzed articles/videos1,796 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Speculation results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 726 hits. Analysis detected 7,574 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,319 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (8,211 of 16,562 topics). This Speculation is worse (more manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group.
Speculation
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,319
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510050.4% percentile
3.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.4%11.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.5%11.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 9.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos