Author summary
88%1 analyzed article/video265 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Kirchick results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Representativeness Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 179 hits. Analysis detected 1,550 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,060 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of 88% (814 of 6,628 authors). This James Kirchick is worse (more manipulative) than 87.70% of the peer group.
James Kirchick
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
88%James Kirchick (selected)7%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,060
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

88% percentile
025507510087.7% percentile
6.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.8%2.8%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 16.0%16.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.0%5.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 15.8%15.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 16.9%16.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 12.9%12.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 4.6%4.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.7%1.7%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Author 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 16.1%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 16.9%, sitewide 8.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 16.0%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.8%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 12.9%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.9%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Middle Ground: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.1%Special Pleading: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.3%Personal Incredulity: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos