Topic summary
⁠32%4 analyzed articles/videos2,521 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Solar Power results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 1,322 hits. Analysis detected 8,356 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,716 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (13,541 of 16,419 topics). This Solar Power is better (less manipulative) than 82.50% of the peer group.
Solar Power
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 11,716
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

18% percentile
025507510017.5% percentile
1.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.3%11.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos