Grist28%

A swarm of solar ‘bees’ are coming to western North Carolina community hubs 21%

By Katie Myers35%

7/14/2026, 1:45:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 154 hits. Analysis detected 1,303 faulty-reasoning hits from 808 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 35.1% and a BS Rank of 21% (17,340 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 79.20% of the article peer group.

Nearly two years ago, Hurricane Helene knocked out power in Burnsville, North Carolina. 
Fire Chief Niles Howell had to use the station’s generator to keep everything running. 
Through the storm, and the devastating flooding that followed, the fire department provided a landing pad for helicopters, a base for search-and-rescue operations, and a field hospital to triage and treat the wounded. 
But even in less trying times, Howell can’t risk another blackout. 
The station is a community hub for the small town, and Howell regularly worries about running out of fuel for the generator. 
He can stop worrying. 
The fire department will soon install 40 kilowatt-hours of solar panels and double that amount of battery storage as part of a statewide microgrid project targeted at communities recovering from Helene. 
“I love redundancy, because inevitably what you plan for will fail at some point in time, so the more avenues you have to keep things going, the better off you are,” Howell said. 
A growing number of organizations and even states are reaching the same conclusion. 
With the Appalachian mountains repeatedly battered by extreme rain and flash flooding in recent years, i small-scale energy resilience projects are catching on. 
Many recent developments are popping up along the path Helene tore through western North Carolina. 
The state Department of Environmental Quality invested $5 million in 26 microgrid projects last August, in partnership with a coalition of nonprofits dedicated to the expansion of sustainable energy. 
The goalis to build 24 stationary microgrids and 2 mobile ones, with five sites announced in June. 
This mirrors similar projects in storm-battered communities across the United States and its territories . 
Private and nonprofit microgrid networks have helped keep Puerto Rican communities electrified through increasingly violent hurricanes and an aging grid prone to frequent blackouts. 
Hurricane Ida prompted churches and community centers in New Orleans to launch a string of privately funded  lighthouses .” 
This island in the Great Lakes wants to tap waves for energy 
Solar microgrids, in short, are capable of powering one or more buildings, and some of them can also send electricity to the grid. 
They often feature large batteries designed to store energy to keep power going for days without sunshine. 
Stationary microgrids, which, as the name suggests, remain in one place, are found throughout the country, sometimes powering essential infrastructure like hospitals and wastewater treatment plants. 
One system operated by Duke Energy powers all of Hot Springs, North Carolina, and kept the lights on during Helene. 
Others are mobile and can be wheeled to wherever they’re needed. 
The technology is expensive, and all but one of the five stationary microgrids slated for western North Carolina will cost over $100,000, a burden a small community organization would struggle to bear on its own. 
The small, portable, trailer-mounted systems, which the renewable energy advocates at the nonprofit Footprint Project call ‘beehives,” feature batteries iand work in sunny and cloudy weather alike. 
“Cooler bees” include fridges and freezers for medications and food, “power bees” provide charging stations for phones and other devices, and “water bees” filter water. 
“Because they are mobile, these bees can be towed immediately to communities hardest hit in disasters,” said Footprint Project CEO Will Heegaard. 
These “bees” provide up to 100 kilowatt hours of energy, and could power a large building for up to 10 hours. 
The Footprint Project is prioritizing installing them outside food banks, fire stations, community centers, and libraries, all of which can store supplies and serve as a hub of community operations during a disaster. 
Two mobile solar power trailers will be ready to deploy in 2027, and installations at five of the planned stationary sites will begin this summer. 
Sara Nichols of the economic development group Land of Sky Regional Council said she hopes this project can demonstrate that a combination of philanthropic and public funding can support small-scale renewables, even when federal changes have reduced the accessibility of solar for many. 
“We are essentially setting the model and the precedent for what we hope will be a much bigger statewide and national project to duplicate,” Nichols said. 
Reid Wilson, who leads the Department of Environmental Quality, is already talking with potential partners around the state about using small-scale solar to build out local climate resiliency throughout North Carolina, though nothing official has come of it yet. 
Federal funding could one day help, he hopes, but he isn’t going to hedge all his bets on it. 
Governor Josh Stein asked the General Assembly to include $1 million for microgrids in his $792 million request for Helene relief funding. 
It didn’t make the cut. 
This story was originally published by Grist with the headline A swarm of solar ‘bees’ are coming to western North Carolina community hubs on Jul 14, 2026. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Katie Myers: 1.0%Grist: 2.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Myers: 0.0%Grist: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%Katie Myers: 1.8%Grist: 3.0%Availability Heuristic6.9%This article: 1.9%Katie Myers: 0.7%Grist: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic1.9%This article: 0.0%Katie Myers: 0.7%Grist: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Katie Myers: 1.5%Grist: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias2.6%This article: 8.8%Katie Myers: 11.9%Grist: 5.0%Framing Effect8.8%This article: 5.7%Katie Myers: 0.5%Grist: 0.7%Loss Aversion5.7%This article: 8.7%Katie Myers: 1.3%Grist: 0.5%Status Quo Bias8.7%This article: 0.0%Katie Myers: 0.0%Grist: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 16.2%Katie Myers: 3.8%Grist: 3.1%Optimism Bias16.2%This article: 0.0%Katie Myers: 0.6%Grist: 2.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.7%Katie Myers: 8.2%Grist: 6.8%Negativity Bias7.7%This article: 0.0%Katie Myers: 0.8%Grist: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Myers: 0.8%Grist: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Myers: 0.0%Grist: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Myers: 0.6%Grist: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Myers: 0.0%Grist: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 9.0%Katie Myers: 1.3%Grist: 1.0%Halo Effect9.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Myers: 0.0%Grist: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Myers: 0.0%Grist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Myers: 0.1%Grist: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Katie Myers: 0.2%Grist: 0.3%Primacy Effect3.2%This article: 0.0%Katie Myers: 0.0%Grist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Myers: 0.0%Grist: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Myers: 0.4%Grist: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.1%Katie Myers: 2.5%Grist: 4.1%Appeal to Authority5.1%This article: 0.0%Katie Myers: 0.2%Grist: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Myers: 0.0%Grist: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Myers: 0.0%Grist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.8%Katie Myers: 1.5%Grist: 3.9%Hasty Generalization6.8%This article: 3.2%Katie Myers: 0.3%Grist: 0.1%Red Herring3.2%This article: 4.8%Katie Myers: 1.5%Grist: 0.6%Bandwagon4.8%This article: 6.8%Katie Myers: 4.2%Grist: 4.0%Appeal to Emotion6.8%This article: 4.1%Katie Myers: 0.5%Grist: 0.7%Begging the Question4.1%This article: 10.6%Katie Myers: 3.6%Grist: 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.6%This article: 0.0%Katie Myers: 0.1%Grist: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Myers: 0.1%Grist: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Myers: 0.0%Grist: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 4.3%Katie Myers: 0.3%Grist: 0.3%Composition/Division4.3%This article: 7.9%Katie Myers: 0.5%Grist: 2.0%Anecdotal7.9%This article: 0.0%Katie Myers: 0.0%Grist: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.5%Katie Myers: 2.3%Grist: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.5%This article: 0.0%Katie Myers: 0.0%Grist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Myers: 0.2%Grist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Myers: 0.0%Grist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Myers: 0.1%Grist: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Myers: 0.3%Grist: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Myers: 0.4%Grist: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Myers: 0.7%Grist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 2.7%Katie Myers: 2.7%Grist: 2.5%Biased Writer Voice2.7%This article: 5.3%Katie Myers: 0.4%Grist: 1.4%Indoctrination5.3%This article: 5.3%Katie Myers: 4.4%Grist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias5.3%This article: 0.0%Katie Myers: 0.4%Grist: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 19.1%Katie Myers: 1.3%Grist: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…19.1%

808 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers36%attributed speech517writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageNiles Howell • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageNiles Howell • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageFootprint Project • 27 words • 100.0% coverageFootprint Project • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWill Heegaard • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageFootprint Project • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageSara Nichols • 43 words • 100.0% coverageSara Nichols • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageReid Wilson • 19 words • 0.0% coverageJosh Stein • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageGrist • 27 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Sara Nichols

100%flagged-word coverage
69 attributed words24% of attributed speech64% writer coverage
0%32.5%65.0%Indoctrination+62.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Sara Nichols: 62.3%62.3%Politically Left Leaning B+62.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Sara Nichols: 62.3%62.3%Attempt to Sell a Product +33.6 ptsWriter: 4.1%Sara Nichols: 37.7%37.7%Biased Writer Voice-4.3 ptsWriter: 4.3%Sara Nichols: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.