Topic summary
⁠42%3 analyzed articles/videos1,948 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Social Safety Net results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Halo Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 1,269 hits. Analysis detected 11,022 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,603 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (12,767 of 15,769 topics). This Social Safety Net is better (less manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510019.0% percentile
1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.5%5.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos