Topic summary
⁠55%3 analyzed articles/videos1,976 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Smoking Cessation results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 831 hits. Analysis detected 7,354 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,310 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (12,556 of 16,562 topics). This Smoking Cessation is better (less manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group.
Smoking Cessation
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510024.2% percentile
2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.9%8.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.4%7.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos