Topic summary
76% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,132 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Small Business Support results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 998 hits . Analysis detected 8,579 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,396 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 36% (9,871 of 15,325 topics). This Small Business Support is better (less manipulative) than 64.40% of the peer group. Small Business Support
Topic details
Total words: 9,396
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.6% percentile 2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst