Author summary
87% 1 analyzed article/video 1,404 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brenda Y. Vasquez results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Optimism Bias , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 872 hits . Analysis detected 4,477 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,212 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,095 of 6,351 authors). This Brenda Y. Vasquez is worse (more manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group. Brenda Y. Vasquez
Author details
Total words: 4,212
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.0% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.2% 3.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 20.7% 20.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 10.4% 10.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 11.4% 11.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Anecdotal: Author 20.7%, sitewide 5.2% Negativity Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.4%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 10.4%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst