Topic summary
7% 5 analyzed articles/videos 665 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sexual Harassment results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 1,093 hits . Analysis detected 8,364 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,721 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (14,134 of 15,984 topics). This Sexual Harassment is better (less manipulative) than 88.40% of the peer group. Sexual Harassment
Topic details
Total words: 12,721
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.6% percentile 1.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst