Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Asher Lehrer-Small results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 365 hits . Analysis detected 2,436 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,358 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Asher Lehrer-Small is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Asher Lehrer-Small
Author details
Total words: 5,358
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst