Topic summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Sex Scandal results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 702 hits. Analysis detected 4,448 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,612 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Sex Scandal is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Sex Scandal
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,612
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 14.9%14.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.4%19.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.3%6.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.5%10.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.0%12.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate